Baltic Countries Are Against Privatization of Power Engineering.

Published: 3 August 2000 y., Thursday
This year Baltic countries are trying to find a lot of questions concerning privatization of power engineering. Almost simultaneously in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, where the parties of the right wing remain in power, the adjustments to sale of the certain enterprises -Lietuvos energija, Latvenergo and Eesti energia, has begun.

In Latvia opposition is against the intention to sell Latvenergo; two parties have collected 307 thousands signatures. This means if coalition insists, the next stage will be referendum the results of which may be logically predicted. The privatization turned to be unpopular; even for the coalition it was very unexpected. Rating of the main privatizing person A.Shkele, the leader of the party, has fallen almost to zero. But the popularity of the left wing has sharply risen.

As a result the ruling majority has changed the law on power engineering so that Latvenergo is eliminated from the list of enterprises that may be privatized. Here the law meets the requirements of the opposition. In fact, this means not only refusal of privatization but of the association with Eesti energija in which both parts were engaged since this spring. Latvian reviewers stress that this is the first time opinion of society turned to be more influential than the wants of the ruling parties. And now they are trying to explain that their attention was towards this, too, that they simply were “incorrectly understood.”

In Estonia 49% of the shares of the most powerful power stations, which produce more than 90% of electric power in the country, may be sold to the American power company NRG Energy Inc.

Just as in Latvia, opposition in Estonia was not silent, too. According to it, giving power engineering to one owner will lead to increase in prices. So last week it organized mass meeting near the Toompea castle in Tallinn. The opposition has even begun talks with the Latvian opposition offering it to create a kind of common front against the American invasion into Baltic power engineering.

Something like this occurs in Lithuania today. Here the ruling coalition tried to force privatization of Lietuvos energija. Restructure of Lietuvos energija began last year. Its further division and privatization is foreseen in strategy of power engineering development accepted this year.

It’s unlikely that during the period left till the elections the right wing will be able to take serious steps concerning restructure. And the left wing, according to all the signs, position of which will become stronger claim they won’t let power system to be sold. They claim experience with privatization of telecom is a good example. After two Scandinavian companies became the owners of telecom they regularly increase tariffs though their incomes overhead set trends. They are also expected to make changes in the scheme of restructure.

By the way ,according to the unofficial data, it’s because Lithuanians didn’t coordinate their plans with the neighbors, Latvians and Estonians have ignored Lithuania in aspiration for integrating into unique Baltic power system.
Copying, publishing, announcing any information from the News.lt portal without written permission of News.lt editorial office is prohibited.

Facebook Comments

New comment


Captcha

Associated articles

The most popular articles

Central Government Debt in January

According to the data presented by the Ministry of Finance, in end-January central government debt made up LTL26, 310.8 million or 28% of projected GDP for 2010 (LTL 93, 819 million). more »

China crisis getting worse

As far as countries affected by the economic crisis, China fared extremely well. more »

State aid: Commission authorises temporary Slovak scheme to grant limited amounts of aid of up to €15,000 to farmers

The European Commission has authorised today a Slovak scheme with a budget of approximately €3.32 million which aims at supporting farmers in Slovakia who encounter difficulties as a result of the current economic crisis. more »

Europe 2020: Commission proposes new economic strategy

Commission sets out a 10-year strategy for reviving the European economy, casting a vision of ‘smart, sustainable, inclusive' growth rooted in greater coordination of national and European policy. more »

Europe 2020: Commission proposes new economic strategy in Europe

The European Commission has launched today the Europe 2020 Strategy to go out of the crisis and prepare EU economy for the next decade. The Commission identifies three key drivers for growth, to be implemented through concrete actions at EU and national levels. more »

EU Aid Programme for Turkish Cypriot Community

Launching of the “SCHOOLS’ initiative for innovation and changes” Grant scheme. more »

Transaction tax and debt moratorium needed to meet development needs, say MEPs

EU Member States must not only deliver on their international aid pledges, but also bring in a financial transactions tax and a temporary debt moratorium, to help developing countries to cope with the effects of the global financial and economic crisis, said the Development Committee on Monday. more »

EBRD offers new funds to promote sustainable energy investments in Slovakia

The EBRD is increasing its commitments to promote sustainable energy projects in Slovakia with a new €90 million funding under the existing Slovakia Sustainable Energy Finance Facility (SLOVSEFF) to ensure continuous implementation of energy efficiency and small renewable energy projects. more »

During 2009 Bank SNORAS earned LTL 8.7 million profit

According to the unaudited data, in 2009 AB Bank SNORAS earned LTL 8.7 million profit. The bank’s assets grew by 11 per cent up to LTL 6.342 billion during 2009 and were by LTL 647.8 million larger than at the beginning of 2009. more »

Airport charges: security is Member States' responsibility, say MEPs

Aviation security measures that go beyond common EU requirements should be paid for by Member States, not by passengers, said Transport Committee MEPs in a vote on Monday that could put Parliament on a collision course with the Council of Ministers. more »