The Georgian government and the International Monetary Fund remain at odds over ways to close the Caucasus country’s widening budget deficit, and over other measures to improve economic policy
Published:
20 July 2003 y., Sunday
The IMF has given Georgian officials until mid August to implement reforms in several specified areas. At stake for Tbilisi is not only direct IMF assistance, but also the Georgian government’s ability to reschedule its Paris Club debt.
An IMF delegation wrapped up a fact-finding mission to Georgia on July 7. At the conclusion of the visit, IMF representatives issued a memorandum stating that its ability to complete a final review of a nearly three-year-old Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) was dependent on the Georgian government’s willingness to carry out targeted reforms. The IMF set August 15 as the deadline for Tbilisi for reforms, including: trimming roughly 100 million lari (about $47 million) from the state budget; improving tax collection while simplifying the tax code; raising energy tariffs; and settling arrears to the state pension system.
If Georgia is unable to implement the changes, the IMF is likely to withhold the final tranche of a $31 million loan under the PRGF. Of far greater importance for Georgia, the IMF has threatened to withdraw its support for Tbilisi’s efforts to get its Paris Club debt rescheduled. Talks between Georgia and the Paris Club of creditor nations are scheduled to occur in September. If Tbilisi is unable to reschedule the debt, it faces a potentially budget-busting $50 million payment by the end of 2003.
"We’ve been trying to complete this [PRGF] review since November," IMF Resident Representative to Georgia Jonathan Dunn told EurasiaNet. However, Dunn stressed that the IMF "has left the door cracked open" for Georgia to make the demanded policy changes.
The IMF stance creates a quandary for Georgia’s government, as parliamentary elections loom in November. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archives]. Implementation of the IMF-mandated reforms could stir popular dissatisfaction, possibly costing President Eduard Shevardnadze supporters at the polls in November. Conversely, inaction by the government, especially concerning the Paris Club debt rescheduling, could create an even bigger public backlash. Either way, Georgia seems to be facing its last opportunity to implement reforms and avoid severe fiscal strain, possibly even default.
Šaltinis:
eurasianet.org
Copying, publishing, announcing any information from the News.lt portal without written permission of News.lt editorial office is prohibited.
The most popular articles
The EU needs a strategy by 2011 to encourage the creation of green jobs, says a draft resolution by the Employment and Social Affairs Committee that was adopted on Wednesday.
more »
Householders should not have to go without gas due to a gas-supply crisis, and such crises should be better managed, thanks to EU-wide co-ordination procedures and interconnection requirements laid down in draft legislation agreed informally with the Council at the end of June and approved by the Industry Committee on Tuesday.
more »
Today the Council has taken the formal decision which will pave the way for the introduction of the euro in Estonia as of 1 January 2011 and will become the 17th European Union country to share the euro currency.
more »
Proposals to improve protection for bank account holders and retail investors, and set up similar schemes for insurance policies.
more »
How should the EU's farm policy be reshaped and how should it be funded after 2013?
more »
MEPs on Wednesday approved some of the strictest rules in the world on bankers' bonuses.
more »
Long before the financial crisis the European Parliament regularly pointed out the significant failures in the EU’s supervision of ever more integrated financial markets.
more »
New strategy for stimulating tourism in Europe – to realise the full potential of an industry that already plays an important role in the economy.
more »
The European Commission has disclosed who in 2009 received EU funds in policy areas like research, education and culture, energy and transport or external aid.
more »
The European Commission has approved 19 programmes in 14 Member States (Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, France, Greece, Italy, Ireland, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia, Spain and the United Kingdom) to provide information on and to promote agricultural products in the European Union.
more »