A lawsuit against AT&T Corp

Published: 26 October 1999 y., Tuesday
GTE Corp. has filed a lawsuit against AT&T Corp.,as well as its exclusive provider of broadband Internet access services, Excite@Home, saying that AT&T and Excite@Home have set up a business arrangement that denies consumers a choice in who they want as their preferred broadband services provider. GTE also named Comcast as one of the defendants, along with AT&T subsidiary Tele-Communications Inc. GTE said that other Internet service providers should be able to get access to the AT&T-controlled cable pipe, and that if this cannot happen, consumers will be forced to use AT&T_s preferred providers for their cable Internet access, even if they want a competing provider. In a quick response to the charges, Excite@Home issued a compact statement saying that since the Telecommunications Act of 1996 became law, "GTE has spent millions on lawyers in an effort to prevent consumers from reaping the benefits of competition as the law intended." The company also said that GTE also has "lost every significant case." "It would be absurd for the court to find that the antitrust laws should be used to protect an entrenched monopolist, such as GTE, with a greater than 95 percent market share from a new competitor, like Excite@Home, who has less than a 2 percent market share," Excite@Home also said, though it did not describe what it meant by market share. At issue in the lawsuit is the case of open access, or, as AT&T terms it, forced access. AT&T when it bought TCI declined to open up its new cable infrastructure to competing Internet service providers that want to offer broadband services, saying that they are under no obligation to do so. Instead, AT&T forged an exclusive agreement with Excite@Home to provide cable-based broadband Internet access until 2002. Competing ISPs, including some of the baby Bells and incumbent local exchange carriers like GTE and US West Inc., along with companies like America Online Inc.,have argued that it is anti-competitive to keep the networks closed since cable is one of the best ways to receive broadband services. Several courts have disagreed and AT&T currently is appealing a case in Portland, Ore., and surrounding Multnomah County. The FCC, meanwhile, has officially stated that it will not get involved with forcing open access upon AT&T or other cable operators.
Šaltinis: Newsbytes.com
Copying, publishing, announcing any information from the News.lt portal without written permission of News.lt editorial office is prohibited.

Facebook Comments

New comment


Captcha

Associated articles

Lithuania's First 3G Call

Lithuania's acting president H. E. Arturas Paulauskas made the country's first 3G call over Omnitel's trial network on May 1st more »

3G will 'be the norm' in 2009

Seven out of ten Western European mobile users will have a 3G-enabled device within five years more »

New worm's got sass, but not much else

The security researchers at eEye Digital Security are not impressed with the Sasser worm more »

search.lt news

search.lt presents newest links more »

New Blade Servers

HP: Trim the Fat with Efficeon Blades more »

Spying software watches you work

Spyware has infected almost all companies polled for a survey about web-using habits at work more »

New form of digital radio launched

Nokia postions visual radio against DAB more »

search.lt news

search.lt presents newest links more »

A portal site DirectEurope

HP, Oracle, OTP launch portal site to assist applications for EU funds more »

IBM expands search push with Masala

Finding things is becoming a growing concern for IBM more »