A lawsuit against AT&T Corp

Published: 26 October 1999 y., Tuesday
GTE Corp. has filed a lawsuit against AT&T Corp.,as well as its exclusive provider of broadband Internet access services, Excite@Home, saying that AT&T and Excite@Home have set up a business arrangement that denies consumers a choice in who they want as their preferred broadband services provider. GTE also named Comcast as one of the defendants, along with AT&T subsidiary Tele-Communications Inc. GTE said that other Internet service providers should be able to get access to the AT&T-controlled cable pipe, and that if this cannot happen, consumers will be forced to use AT&T_s preferred providers for their cable Internet access, even if they want a competing provider. In a quick response to the charges, Excite@Home issued a compact statement saying that since the Telecommunications Act of 1996 became law, "GTE has spent millions on lawyers in an effort to prevent consumers from reaping the benefits of competition as the law intended." The company also said that GTE also has "lost every significant case." "It would be absurd for the court to find that the antitrust laws should be used to protect an entrenched monopolist, such as GTE, with a greater than 95 percent market share from a new competitor, like Excite@Home, who has less than a 2 percent market share," Excite@Home also said, though it did not describe what it meant by market share. At issue in the lawsuit is the case of open access, or, as AT&T terms it, forced access. AT&T when it bought TCI declined to open up its new cable infrastructure to competing Internet service providers that want to offer broadband services, saying that they are under no obligation to do so. Instead, AT&T forged an exclusive agreement with Excite@Home to provide cable-based broadband Internet access until 2002. Competing ISPs, including some of the baby Bells and incumbent local exchange carriers like GTE and US West Inc., along with companies like America Online Inc.,have argued that it is anti-competitive to keep the networks closed since cable is one of the best ways to receive broadband services. Several courts have disagreed and AT&T currently is appealing a case in Portland, Ore., and surrounding Multnomah County. The FCC, meanwhile, has officially stated that it will not get involved with forcing open access upon AT&T or other cable operators.
Šaltinis: Newsbytes.com
Copying, publishing, announcing any information from the News.lt portal without written permission of News.lt editorial office is prohibited.

Facebook Comments

New comment


Captcha

Associated articles

Google Makeover Gets 'Personal'

Looking to stave off aggressive competition from rivals such as Yahoo and Microsoft, search technology powerhouse Google has started testing a personalized Web search feature more »

search.lt news

search.lt presents newest links more »

Ballmer rues Web-search decision

Internet searching is a hot technology business, but you wouldn't know it from looking at Microsoft more »

Lindows plans US gov backed global assault on Windows trademark

Lindows.com intends to use a US Department of Commerce programme to have Microsoft's trademarks of Windows invalidated worldwide more »

CeBIT'2004: All in One Screen

Why have two or more screens when you can make do with just one? more »

Sony Ericsson banks on 3G appeal

The future looks bright for third generation mobiles, according to the boss of phone maker Sony Ericsson more »

New Standard Would Let Devices Communicate by Touch

Visa has already distributed millions of so-called contactless credit cards cards that can be read by simply waving them in front of small machines more »

The "Swissmemory USB Victorinox"

It's got everything from a toothpick to a bottle opener and screw driver more »

No Bigger than A Pen

German company Siemens introduced its latest contribution to the mini phone rage: the PenPhone more »

Dancing Robots

Kunitake Ando, President of Sony, unveils the Japanese company's contribution to artificial intelligence: a dancing robot more »