A lawsuit against AT&T Corp

Published: 26 October 1999 y., Tuesday
GTE Corp. has filed a lawsuit against AT&T Corp.,as well as its exclusive provider of broadband Internet access services, Excite@Home, saying that AT&T and Excite@Home have set up a business arrangement that denies consumers a choice in who they want as their preferred broadband services provider. GTE also named Comcast as one of the defendants, along with AT&T subsidiary Tele-Communications Inc. GTE said that other Internet service providers should be able to get access to the AT&T-controlled cable pipe, and that if this cannot happen, consumers will be forced to use AT&T_s preferred providers for their cable Internet access, even if they want a competing provider. In a quick response to the charges, Excite@Home issued a compact statement saying that since the Telecommunications Act of 1996 became law, "GTE has spent millions on lawyers in an effort to prevent consumers from reaping the benefits of competition as the law intended." The company also said that GTE also has "lost every significant case." "It would be absurd for the court to find that the antitrust laws should be used to protect an entrenched monopolist, such as GTE, with a greater than 95 percent market share from a new competitor, like Excite@Home, who has less than a 2 percent market share," Excite@Home also said, though it did not describe what it meant by market share. At issue in the lawsuit is the case of open access, or, as AT&T terms it, forced access. AT&T when it bought TCI declined to open up its new cable infrastructure to competing Internet service providers that want to offer broadband services, saying that they are under no obligation to do so. Instead, AT&T forged an exclusive agreement with Excite@Home to provide cable-based broadband Internet access until 2002. Competing ISPs, including some of the baby Bells and incumbent local exchange carriers like GTE and US West Inc., along with companies like America Online Inc.,have argued that it is anti-competitive to keep the networks closed since cable is one of the best ways to receive broadband services. Several courts have disagreed and AT&T currently is appealing a case in Portland, Ore., and surrounding Multnomah County. The FCC, meanwhile, has officially stated that it will not get involved with forcing open access upon AT&T or other cable operators.
Šaltinis: Newsbytes.com
Copying, publishing, announcing any information from the News.lt portal without written permission of News.lt editorial office is prohibited.

Facebook Comments

New comment


Captcha

Associated articles

Symantec Offers SMBs a Better Sense of Security

Firewalls, VPNs, intrusion detection are becoming as common in the business vernacular as balance sheets, P & L statements and chart of accounts more »

IBM To Bulk Up On-Demand Centers

IBM is set to make a major push in its drive to become the top provider of utility, or "on-demand," computing services more »

search.lt news

search.lt presents newest links more »

CeBIT'2004: Talking technology

Talkative future for every gadget more »

The accusation

Internet suppliers have to connect abroad in order to connect with Poland more »

Panasonic preps 1GB Secure Digital card

Panasonic announced on Friday that it plans to launch a 1GB Secure Digital card first in Japan in April more »

Who should govern the Net?

It's no longer merely an academic question more »

NEC shrinks music, grows phones

NEC has launched the e616, its latest feature-packed 3G handset at CeBIT more »

Sony doubles up with AIT-4

Sony has launched the fourth generation of its AIT (Advanced Intelligent Tape) format at CeBIT more »

ICANN surveys proposed Net domains

The Internet's real estate may soon be expanding, with the proposed addition of up to nine new top-level domains, including .jobs, .xxx, .travel and .mail more »