A lawsuit against AT&T Corp

Published: 26 October 1999 y., Tuesday
GTE Corp. has filed a lawsuit against AT&T Corp.,as well as its exclusive provider of broadband Internet access services, Excite@Home, saying that AT&T and Excite@Home have set up a business arrangement that denies consumers a choice in who they want as their preferred broadband services provider. GTE also named Comcast as one of the defendants, along with AT&T subsidiary Tele-Communications Inc. GTE said that other Internet service providers should be able to get access to the AT&T-controlled cable pipe, and that if this cannot happen, consumers will be forced to use AT&T_s preferred providers for their cable Internet access, even if they want a competing provider. In a quick response to the charges, Excite@Home issued a compact statement saying that since the Telecommunications Act of 1996 became law, "GTE has spent millions on lawyers in an effort to prevent consumers from reaping the benefits of competition as the law intended." The company also said that GTE also has "lost every significant case." "It would be absurd for the court to find that the antitrust laws should be used to protect an entrenched monopolist, such as GTE, with a greater than 95 percent market share from a new competitor, like Excite@Home, who has less than a 2 percent market share," Excite@Home also said, though it did not describe what it meant by market share. At issue in the lawsuit is the case of open access, or, as AT&T terms it, forced access. AT&T when it bought TCI declined to open up its new cable infrastructure to competing Internet service providers that want to offer broadband services, saying that they are under no obligation to do so. Instead, AT&T forged an exclusive agreement with Excite@Home to provide cable-based broadband Internet access until 2002. Competing ISPs, including some of the baby Bells and incumbent local exchange carriers like GTE and US West Inc., along with companies like America Online Inc.,have argued that it is anti-competitive to keep the networks closed since cable is one of the best ways to receive broadband services. Several courts have disagreed and AT&T currently is appealing a case in Portland, Ore., and surrounding Multnomah County. The FCC, meanwhile, has officially stated that it will not get involved with forcing open access upon AT&T or other cable operators.
Šaltinis: Newsbytes.com
Copying, publishing, announcing any information from the News.lt portal without written permission of News.lt editorial office is prohibited.

Facebook Comments

New comment


Captcha

Associated articles

The Most Destructive Viruses of All Time

With the SQL Slammer virus, more than 500,000 servers worldwide were infected, there was a general slowdown all over the Internet more »

The proposal

KGB in Belarusian web more »

ICANN approves six user community groups

Organization takes first step toward giving individuals a voice in how the Internet is run more »

U.N. tech summit ends

Many tough decisions deferred for 2 years more »

Microsoft brought legal action

Lindows.com ordered to drop Lindows name more »

PayPal Slashes Micropayments Fees

PayPal wants a slice of the online music pie more »

search.lt news

search.lt presents newest links more »

Europe 'broadband revolution' leads the world

The future is burning bright for the ICT manufacturing and services across the European Union as the continent enjoys a "broadband revolution" and takes up global leadership in the mobile sector more »

Sweden proposes drastic fines for spammers

The Swedish government tabled a draft law that would allow it to to crack down on people who flood email inboxes with unwanted advertisements, so-called spam. more »

search.lt news

search.lt presents newest links more »