A lawsuit against AT&T Corp

Published: 26 October 1999 y., Tuesday
GTE Corp. has filed a lawsuit against AT&T Corp.,as well as its exclusive provider of broadband Internet access services, Excite@Home, saying that AT&T and Excite@Home have set up a business arrangement that denies consumers a choice in who they want as their preferred broadband services provider. GTE also named Comcast as one of the defendants, along with AT&T subsidiary Tele-Communications Inc. GTE said that other Internet service providers should be able to get access to the AT&T-controlled cable pipe, and that if this cannot happen, consumers will be forced to use AT&T_s preferred providers for their cable Internet access, even if they want a competing provider. In a quick response to the charges, Excite@Home issued a compact statement saying that since the Telecommunications Act of 1996 became law, "GTE has spent millions on lawyers in an effort to prevent consumers from reaping the benefits of competition as the law intended." The company also said that GTE also has "lost every significant case." "It would be absurd for the court to find that the antitrust laws should be used to protect an entrenched monopolist, such as GTE, with a greater than 95 percent market share from a new competitor, like Excite@Home, who has less than a 2 percent market share," Excite@Home also said, though it did not describe what it meant by market share. At issue in the lawsuit is the case of open access, or, as AT&T terms it, forced access. AT&T when it bought TCI declined to open up its new cable infrastructure to competing Internet service providers that want to offer broadband services, saying that they are under no obligation to do so. Instead, AT&T forged an exclusive agreement with Excite@Home to provide cable-based broadband Internet access until 2002. Competing ISPs, including some of the baby Bells and incumbent local exchange carriers like GTE and US West Inc., along with companies like America Online Inc.,have argued that it is anti-competitive to keep the networks closed since cable is one of the best ways to receive broadband services. Several courts have disagreed and AT&T currently is appealing a case in Portland, Ore., and surrounding Multnomah County. The FCC, meanwhile, has officially stated that it will not get involved with forcing open access upon AT&T or other cable operators.
Šaltinis: Newsbytes.com
Copying, publishing, announcing any information from the News.lt portal without written permission of News.lt editorial office is prohibited.

Facebook Comments

New comment


Captcha

Associated articles

Hackers Limit Disruption To Small Internet Sites

A battle among hackers erupted on the Internet yesterday as some factions disrupted a loosely coordinated effort among other groups trying to vandalize Web sites around the world more »

search.lt news

search.lt presents newest links more »

Denmark stops import of IT specialists outside normal rules

It will no longer be possible for Danish companies to automatically employ foreign IT specialists as an exception to the ordinary strict rules on residence permits more »

Over 200m European internet users by 2004, survey

Europe's online population reached 184m by the end of 2002 and will surge beyond 200m by the end of 2004 more »

IDC: OVER ONE MILLION INTERNET USERS IN CROATIA BY END OF 2003

It is possible to expect that by the end of this year there will be over one million Internet users in Croatia more »

Microsoft Enters Identity Management Fray

Microsoft rivals have been staking out a claim to the identity management space -- a critical component of Web services more »

search.lt news

search.lt presents newest links more »

ICANN comes to terms with country domains

Internet overseeing organisation ICANN has backed down in its battle with the rest of the world more »

The new banking software

Deutsche Bank S.p.A Italy Augments Service and Profitability via ACI's BASE24-es Software more »

search.lt news

search.lt presents newest links more »