A lawsuit against AT&T Corp

Published: 26 October 1999 y., Tuesday
GTE Corp. has filed a lawsuit against AT&T Corp.,as well as its exclusive provider of broadband Internet access services, Excite@Home, saying that AT&T and Excite@Home have set up a business arrangement that denies consumers a choice in who they want as their preferred broadband services provider. GTE also named Comcast as one of the defendants, along with AT&T subsidiary Tele-Communications Inc. GTE said that other Internet service providers should be able to get access to the AT&T-controlled cable pipe, and that if this cannot happen, consumers will be forced to use AT&T_s preferred providers for their cable Internet access, even if they want a competing provider. In a quick response to the charges, Excite@Home issued a compact statement saying that since the Telecommunications Act of 1996 became law, "GTE has spent millions on lawyers in an effort to prevent consumers from reaping the benefits of competition as the law intended." The company also said that GTE also has "lost every significant case." "It would be absurd for the court to find that the antitrust laws should be used to protect an entrenched monopolist, such as GTE, with a greater than 95 percent market share from a new competitor, like Excite@Home, who has less than a 2 percent market share," Excite@Home also said, though it did not describe what it meant by market share. At issue in the lawsuit is the case of open access, or, as AT&T terms it, forced access. AT&T when it bought TCI declined to open up its new cable infrastructure to competing Internet service providers that want to offer broadband services, saying that they are under no obligation to do so. Instead, AT&T forged an exclusive agreement with Excite@Home to provide cable-based broadband Internet access until 2002. Competing ISPs, including some of the baby Bells and incumbent local exchange carriers like GTE and US West Inc., along with companies like America Online Inc.,have argued that it is anti-competitive to keep the networks closed since cable is one of the best ways to receive broadband services. Several courts have disagreed and AT&T currently is appealing a case in Portland, Ore., and surrounding Multnomah County. The FCC, meanwhile, has officially stated that it will not get involved with forcing open access upon AT&T or other cable operators.
Šaltinis: Newsbytes.com
Copying, publishing, announcing any information from the News.lt portal without written permission of News.lt editorial office is prohibited.

Facebook Comments

New comment


Captcha

Associated articles

New service

Austrians can use mobiles to monitor Czech, Slovak radiation more »

Antivirus companies consider 'Coronex' a low threat

New e-mail worm exploits SARS anxiety more »

First Ever Linux Summit In Finland A Success

The Linux Summit 2003, arranged by SOT in co-operation with HP, Oracle and F-Secure was a declared a success for both organizers and attendees more »

ITAA Calls for Cybersecurity Czar

The Information Technology Association of America is calling for the appointment of a "cyber czar" in the wake of the resignations of key White House cybersecurity advisors more »

search.lt news

search.lt presents newest links more »

Estonia Blazes Internet Trail Back

Banking is actually booming in Estonia - via Internet more »

Poland snubs EU by buying US fighter jets

The $6.2b deal with Lockheed sparks outcry from not just European governments but also American unions more »

search.lt news

search.lt presents newest links more »

IBM Plans Sneak Attack On Microsoft Office

There will soon be another entrant in the lopsided Office wars more »

What Windows Server 2003 Will Mean for IT

There will be performance improvements and cool features in Microsoft's new server, but if an enterprise is a volume licensing customer or an NT 4.0 shop, the choice to upgrade may be no choice at all more »