The controversial contract

Published: 3 April 2001 y., Tuesday
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) violated its own bylaws and shortchanged the Internet community by approving a contract that could give VeriSign Inc. near permanent control over the ".com" addressing space, an ICANN board member said today. One of only three ICANN board members to vote against approving the controversial contract, Cisco Systems Engineer Karl Auerbach said that the US Government would be justified in stepping in to nullify the deal. "This was not a win for the Internet community. This was a win for some business interests, VeriSign in particular," Auerbach said. "The Department of Commerce has a responsibility to the citizens of the United States who have been left out of the benefits of this contract." In an early morning phone meeting today, ICANN's board of directors voted 12- 3 to approve the contract inked by VeriSign and the ICANN staff at the beginning of March. Under the deal, VeriSign will be allowed to retain back-end control over the .com registry until 2007 and beyond in exchange for surrendering its control over .org. The proposed arrangement also would give VeriSign an opportunity to maintain its hold over the popular ".net" Internet domain. News of the landmark arrangement shocked many members of the Internet addressing community, prompting sharp criticism from those who felt ICANN gave VeriSign too sweet a deal. Auerbach concurred with those criticisms, adding that he believed ICANN had failed to go through the proper internal channels in the process of ratifying the deal. But while Auerbach criticized the deal, the ICANN staff defended the contract in a conference call with reporters today, arguing that the arrangement will contribute to, rather than detract from the strength and stability of the DNS. The contract will not take effect, however, unless the US Commerce Department approves today's ICANN Board decision. ICANN, the US not-for-profit firm charged with managing the Internet's addressing system, operates autonomously from the US government, but the Commerce Department, which approved ICANN's charter, retains the power to veto ICANN decisions regarding the addressing space.
Šaltinis: Newsbytes
Copying, publishing, announcing any information from the News.lt portal without written permission of News.lt editorial office is prohibited.

Facebook Comments

New comment


Captcha

Associated articles

iPhone5 will go on sale in September

A new generation of smart phone "iPhone5" will go on sale in September. more »

Combination Memory

The Collector USB Flash Drive is one awesome concept that I’d love to see on shelves. more »

Google Invests $168 Million In BrightSource Energy Solar Power Plant In The Mojave

Internet Giant Google announced that they will be investing $168 million in a solar energy power plant being developed in the Mojave Desert by the startup BrightSource Energy. more »

Batteries - recharged within minutes

New battery in your phone or laptop, that is charged hundreds of times faster. more »

Facebook shares green data centre technology secrets

Facebook has announced that it will share the design secrets behind its new energy-efficient data centre with rival companies. more »

ASUS Releases the New ASUS-Automobili Lamborghini VX7 notebook

The powerful new 15.6” ASUS-Automobili Lamborghini VX7 offers a completely revamped notebook experience... more »

Moonwatch clock

Moonwatch clock is designed to determine the relation between lunar cycle and human emotions. more »

Apple, Google, Amazon and Microsoft Make Up 4 Of The Top 10 Most Admired Companies

Every year, Fortune magazine comes out with its list of the Most Admired Companies in the world. more »

NASA spacecraft snaps Mercury

NASA's Messenger spacecraft delivers its first photos of Mercury and the first images ever taken from the rocky planet's own orbit. more »

Social media seminar looks at role of Facebook et al in European discourse

What is the current role and likely future role of social media tools like Facebook and Twitter in framing European discourse? more »